Kansspelautoriteit (KSA) has released the results of its latest investigation into potential match-fixing in sports betting, following the Sports Betting Intelligence Unit (SBIU) receiving a number of alerts.

In response, the KSA decided to review the way four licensed operators identify and manage the risk of match-fixing. The goal of the assessment was to verify if these companies properly analyze threats to sports integrity and take the necessary steps to reduce them. 

Reassuring Results

Under Dutch law, operators are required to carry out regular risk assessments to ensure their betting activities remain fair and transparent.

Overall, the regulator was encouraged by what it found, noting that operators have made noticeable improvements compared to last year, especially in how they structure and document their risk analyses. 

However, the report also highlighted a few gaps that still need attention. According to the KSA, operators could be more specific in defining certain risks, improving how they implement mitigation measures, and ensuring that reporting obligations are consistently met.

The investigation showed progress, but the regulator took the opportunity to remind companies they should keep the focus on their ongoing efforts and vigilance.

Fresh License for Skill Games

The KSA has also announced its intention to introduce a new type of gaming licence for skill-based machines, joining the current licence that covers all types of gaming machines in halls, bars, and restaurants. 

In other words, Dutch operators will soon be able to apply for permission to run machines that reward skill, rather than slot machines that rely on random number generators or other luck-based systems. 

The regulator explained that the move should create a better distinction between different game types while improving oversight across the sector.

The KSA has also confirmed that brick-and-mortar gambling operators affected by Covid-19 lockdowns will receive partial tax refunds, according to a new ruling by the Council of State. 

The ruling determined that the gambling tax should not have been applied to gaming machine operators during 2020, when venues were forced to shut down.